IT部落

 找回密碼
 立即註冊

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

搜索
熱搜: 活動 交友 discuz
查看: 10|回復: 0

Company is prohibited from sending employees to research products from other ...

[複製鏈接]

1

主題

1

帖子

5

積分

新手进村

Rank: 1

積分
5
發表於 2024-3-16 16:14:51 | 顯示全部樓層 |閱讀模式

A company that sends employees to a competitor's store to collect product data, such as characteristics and price, practices unfair competition. This is what judge Dorival Renato Pavan, of the Court of Justice of Mato Grosso do Sul, understood when prohibiting employees of a consultancy and technology company from entering the stores of a home and construction materials chain, under penalty of a daily fine of R $10 thousand.


According to the author, all the items researched would serve to feed an online program consulted by a market competitor, which would make it reduce prices and unfairly attract consumers.

The 12th Civil Court of Campo Grande B2B Lead had denied the request for an injunction, recognizing free access for the defendant's employees to research the products displayed in the plaintiff's stores.

Represented by Raghiant, Torres e Medeiros Advogados , the construction materials chain filed an appeal. According to lawyers, the practice violates the constitutional principles of the inviolability of private property, free business activity and free competition.

Invasion of property
For judge Dorival Renato Pavan,  the author is not obliged to allow them to carry out research in their stores that will benefit their competitors. According to him, the activity carried out by the defendant goes beyond the limits of simple informative research.

“In this case, it is not a question of the competitor using advertising, reducing its prices based on the values ​​used in the wholesale purchase of its products and offering them at retail, but rather of invading the appellant's property to collect data there. and images, including the barcode of the products, to encourage the competitor to charge lower prices, attracting a clientele that belonged to the appellant, causing it losses in its own sales”, he analyzed.



Therefore, Pavan granted an injunction to suspend the first instance decision and prohibited researchers from entering the company's stores, under penalty of a daily fine of R$10,000 and committing the crime of disobedience.

回復

使用道具 舉報

您需要登錄後才可以回帖 登錄 | 立即註冊

本版積分規則

QQ|Archiver|手机版|自動贊助|中国农垦

GMT+8, 2025-2-20 10:31 , Processed in 0.051573 second(s), 19 queries .

抗攻擊 by GameHost X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表
一粒米 | 中興米 | 論壇美工 | 設計 抗ddos | 天堂私服 | ddos | ddos | 防ddos | 防禦ddos | 防ddos主機 | 天堂美工 | 設計 防ddos主機 | 抗ddos主機 | 抗ddos | 抗ddos主機 | 抗攻擊論壇 | 天堂自動贊助 | 免費論壇 | 天堂私服 | 天堂123 | 台南清潔 | 天堂 | 天堂私服 | 免費論壇申請 | 抗ddos | 虛擬主機 | 實體主機 | vps | 網域註冊 | 抗攻擊遊戲主機 | ddos |